“Epic Fury”: The End of Great Dreams
Iran has changed and moved to the opposite extreme from excessive revolutionary romanticism to excessive pragmatism.
Archive
Iran has changed and moved to the opposite extreme from excessive revolutionary romanticism to excessive pragmatism.
The contemporary crisis stems from a deeper structural problem: modern capitalism has weakened many of the mechanisms through which wealth was once partially redirected toward the common good.
Why debates over deterrence ignore the region’s central asymmetry: one state’s overwhelming conventional supremacy, undeclared nuclear arsenal, and immunity from the rules imposed on everyone else.
The American-Iranian negotiations are marked by uncertainty, ambiguity, and stalemate. Why is that the case, and what could it lead to?
As Gaza burned, Arab rulers pursued strategic caution while popular anger deepened, exposing a widening gulf between state policy and the emotional politics of the street.
A war meant to force Iran’s collapse has instead exposed the enduring power of ideology, identity, and belief, and the persistent failure of liberal assumptions that reduce politics to economics and elections alone.
From George Washington’s insistence on republican modesty to Donald Trump’s public assault on institutional restraint, the presidency has moved from symbol of constitutional virtue to engine of democratic decay.
Italy’s suspension of arms deals with Tel Aviv reflects less a moral reckoning than the domestic pressures, electoral setbacks, and strategic calculations now confronting Giorgia Meloni’s government.
As war with Iran drives the weaponization of the Hormuz Strait, Donald Trump’s personalized foreign policy is testing whether populism can still deliver strategic gains—or only global instability.
Ambassador Mootaz Ahmadein Khalil argues that the conflict is not fundamentally about Iran’s nuclear program or missiles, but about regime change, regional order, and the struggle to shape the postwar balance of power across the Gulf and the wider Middle East.
Egypt’s balancing doctrine faces mounting strain as shifting alliances, regional conflicts, and U.S.–Israeli policy realignments narrow Cairo’s room for maneuver.